Changing
the Course of a River
By
Brian Mattmiller '86
The conventional thinking was that emotions were relegated
to a tiny portion of the brain, called the hypothalamus,
and that they had little effect on the more important
business of rational thinking. But Davidson's work,
with the help of increasingly sophisticated imaging
tools, has shown that emotions have a much more pervasive
influence on the brain.
"I
think of emotions as a kind of ether that permeates
everything," Davidson says. "There is almost
nothing we do that isn't in some way influenced by
an underlying quality of mood. We used to think that
mood was something that interrupted thought, rather
than driving it."
Think
of some of the most complicated life decisions: Should
I marry this person? Should I take this particular
job? Should I buy this house or that house? These
are not decisions made by "cold cognitive calculus,"
Davidson says. "The way we make those decisions
is to consult our feelings. We project into the future
and think how we would feel having chosen this path
or that path."
People
are often accused of thinking with only their hearts
or their heads, but Davidson says healthy decisions
require both. This new field, known as affective neuroscience,
will likely lead to more precise treatments for emotional
disorders, such as depression or panic disorder. While
that may mean new medications with fewer side effects,
his work also suggests the optimistic finding that
the mind, like the body, can be trained to change.
It
is that question that leads to a more personal odyssey
for Davidson, who has been an ardent practitioner
of meditation since his college years at Harvard.
Although he was a strong opponent of the Vietnam War,
to him the peace movement soon became as much a personal
journey as a social quest.
"Meditation really fit into that program,"
he says. "It offered a specific set of methods
that suggested there was a possibility for human transformation
for the better."
Once
in graduate school, Davidson traveled to India, where
he participated in his first intense meditation retreat.
He was in a state of complete silence for several
weeks. He would meditate with one hundred other people
for fourteen to sixteen hours per day. They would
awaken at 4 a.m. and retreat to the meditation hall.
It was the hardest work he has ever done, he says
- "like trying to change the course of a river."
"You
begin to experience just a glimmer of what it feels
like for the mind to be a little quieter," Davidson
says. "You begin to see things a little more
clearly. You become sort of less hijacked by your
emotions." In his early years on the faculty,
Davidson made a few attempts to scientifically measure
this powerful force that he felt in meditation, but
the technology was too crude for a serious investigation.
So he put the effort aside, until recently. Today
he has a number of studies in progress that are measuring
whether the minds of people who regularly meditate
are physically different from those who don't.
The
results may provide further evidence of brain "plasticity,"
the idea that people can alter what was once considered
a hard-and-fast trait. This optimistic idea may be
especially well-received in a country that appears
choked by emotional strife, triggering modern scourges
like road rage and school shootings. Is it possible
that, through our own disciplined efforts, we can
heal our emotions in a way that Prozac can't?
"There
is a disposition in this culture to find a magic pill
that will eliminate certain symptoms without much
effort. It's kind of the American way," Davidson
says. "But our work could underscore the value
of certain kinds of training and hard work that it
might take to change one's mind."
Brian
Mattmiller '86 first met Richard Davidson while covering
research topics at UW-Madison.
back,
1, 2,
3, 4,
5
On Wisconsin
home page