Area. The area considered in this report
is delineated on the attached map [omitted].
Recommendation. That the Board of Regents
designate this area as the Picnic Point – University
Bay Preserve, to be kept in its natural state for recreational
use, and for use as an outdoor laboratory for teaching and
research. Roads, buildings, and other artificial developments
should be excluded.
Argument. The area is of outstanding value
because of its natural beauty, its diverse plant and animal
life, and because it is within walking distance of the campus,
and hence can be quickly reached by students and by classes. It
is already used by many students and by 20 different classes
in various biological subjects, and is the site of 40 published
researches. This existing use is, we believe, its highest
use.
Its value for these purposes would suffer by an artificialization
of the bay, the point, or the adjoining hinterland.
On the other hand its value for these purposes could be enhanced
by the removal of unnatural plantings and structures, by the
restoration of native prairie and woodland vegetation, and
by the installation of certain natural features deliberately
arranged for teaching purposes.
To provide similar facilities, many universities have been
obliged to establish expensive biological stations at distant
points.
Administration. The proposed preserve
is similar in concept to the University Arboretum, and might
well be administered by the Arboretum Committee. It differs
from the Arboretum only in that it offers certain soils and
aquatic habitats not found on the Arboretum, and in being quicker
to reach and hence useable in shorter periods of time.
Boundaries. The
natural features necessary for teaching can be accommodated
on an area smaller than that delineated on the attached map
[omitted], but if the area is to have room for an extended
walk by students, and if it is to be screened and isolated
by suitable plantings from adjoining artificialized land
uses, then the delineated area is the minimum practicable
one.
The private property on “Second Point” should,
if possible, be acquired and added to the proposed preserve.
Note: This report was presented
to the Arboretum Committee at its June 27, 1944 meeting.
After the report, it was moved that the Arboretum Committee
endorse the proposal set up by the Biological Committee; seconded
and passed.
back
to Past Planning
return to Aldo Leopold |